HAPPY ONE YEAR DARLING BABY LOVE!!!!
Wow. Id say that my attitude toward the law course has changed for the better, though not quite enough. I still work in front of the computer and laze around for the most part of the day, or I go out and muck around or get high. But at least I work! It’s far better than last year. I really wanna get absorbed in the course, there are aspects of it which are really interesting, especially with regard to criminal and contract law. but i dont seem to be able to.
PROPERTY IS DOING MY FUCKIN HEAD IN. I don’t even know the difference between overreaching and overriding, and the legal/equitable divide is really so frustrating. I cant even start on the reading. It seems so difficult, yet most of my coursemates would be able to deal with it.
Im way behind on jurisprudence. Way way behind.
Im also behind in criminal and contract and public, but im not too worried about those as they seem easy and interesting
I just want to get the tort essay out of the way. I haven’t read ANYTHING about defamation, but since im meant to do property tonight to prepare for my tutorial and I cant do it, I decided to write an intro for my tort essay just to make myself feel better:
The law of defamation must strike a balance between freedom of expression and the protection of an individual’s reputation. How well, in your view, has the law achieved this balance?
As we understand increasingly the unity of the human symbolic field and how man inhabits an artificial context which is in itself semiotic and governed by common operations, defamation torts undoubtedly help to govern the appropriate apparatus used to regulate this interaction. With the advent of modern technology and globalisation, one’s reputation is almost as sacrosanct as one’s bodily integrity: reputation is an indissoluble aspect of one’s personhood. We do not live in the objective world alone, nor in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the conduit for expression in that particular society. The linguistic resource is highly valued and has been dubbed “freedom of expression”. This essay is concerned with the often conflicting interface between individual interests in reputation and freedom of expression, but lest we forget, they both stem from the same premise that contemporary society is in itself a semiotic one – language, whether in words or actions, can impact our lives; the corollary being that we need to be able to utilise and give it free reign as well as to be protected against its pernicious aspect.
Punchy eh? i shall decide on the substantive aspects of the essay another time haha. i bet it'd be crap
I shall smoke and watch videos now, knowing I put in 30mins of work today.
Wow. Id say that my attitude toward the law course has changed for the better, though not quite enough. I still work in front of the computer and laze around for the most part of the day, or I go out and muck around or get high. But at least I work! It’s far better than last year. I really wanna get absorbed in the course, there are aspects of it which are really interesting, especially with regard to criminal and contract law. but i dont seem to be able to.
PROPERTY IS DOING MY FUCKIN HEAD IN. I don’t even know the difference between overreaching and overriding, and the legal/equitable divide is really so frustrating. I cant even start on the reading. It seems so difficult, yet most of my coursemates would be able to deal with it.
Im way behind on jurisprudence. Way way behind.
Im also behind in criminal and contract and public, but im not too worried about those as they seem easy and interesting
I just want to get the tort essay out of the way. I haven’t read ANYTHING about defamation, but since im meant to do property tonight to prepare for my tutorial and I cant do it, I decided to write an intro for my tort essay just to make myself feel better:
The law of defamation must strike a balance between freedom of expression and the protection of an individual’s reputation. How well, in your view, has the law achieved this balance?
As we understand increasingly the unity of the human symbolic field and how man inhabits an artificial context which is in itself semiotic and governed by common operations, defamation torts undoubtedly help to govern the appropriate apparatus used to regulate this interaction. With the advent of modern technology and globalisation, one’s reputation is almost as sacrosanct as one’s bodily integrity: reputation is an indissoluble aspect of one’s personhood. We do not live in the objective world alone, nor in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the conduit for expression in that particular society. The linguistic resource is highly valued and has been dubbed “freedom of expression”. This essay is concerned with the often conflicting interface between individual interests in reputation and freedom of expression, but lest we forget, they both stem from the same premise that contemporary society is in itself a semiotic one – language, whether in words or actions, can impact our lives; the corollary being that we need to be able to utilise and give it free reign as well as to be protected against its pernicious aspect.
Punchy eh? i shall decide on the substantive aspects of the essay another time haha. i bet it'd be crap
I shall smoke and watch videos now, knowing I put in 30mins of work today.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home